Jasmine Birtles
Your money-making expert. Financial journalist, TV and radio personality.

A few years ago, our Editor Vicky Parry was diagnosed with Crohn’s Disease. Alongside managing the adjustment and frequent hospital visits, she found herself needing support through Personal Independence Payment (PIP). But the system proved so challenging and emotionally draining that she eventually gave up.
Now, a decade on, with suggestions of potential reform, Vicky is revisiting the PIP process. She wants to share her experiences, examine whether the system has truly changed, and offer MoneyMagpie readers an empathetic guide to navigating a process that many find confusing, stressful, and often disheartening.
For many people living with chronic illness, disability or fluctuating health, Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is not optional — it’s essential. It helps cover the extra costs that come with impairment, when daily life becomes harder. Yet for many claimants, PIP doesn’t feel like a safety net. It feels like a battle: bureaucratic, opaque, emotionally draining, and often punishing.
As the Autumn Budget 2025 approaches, talk of reform, tighter eligibility, or reduced payments has intensified. While some of the most extreme proposals have been paused, the threat remains. Meanwhile, campaigners, charities, and people with lived experience are calling for a system that is fair, transparent, and humane.
This article explores:
The welfare landscape has shifted dramatically in the past year. While the most severe cuts to PIP have been shelved, the debate over reform continues.
One of the most contentious ideas floated in Parliament in 2024–25 was a “4-point rule” — where claimants would need to score at least 4 points in one activity to qualify for the daily living component, rather than combining smaller scores across tasks. Critics said it would unfairly exclude people with complex but less visible disabilities.
Other suggested reforms included:
Supporters argue that reform is necessary to curb spending and ensure fairness. Opponents — including charities like the MS Society, Carers UK, and Disability Rights UK — warn it risks abandoning the sickest and most marginalised.
After backlash, the Government removed the most controversial PIP clauses from the 2025 Welfare Bill. However, the DWP still plans a “root and branch review” of disability benefits, led by Sir Stephen Timms, to report in autumn 2026. Many fear that this pause is temporary, not protective.
Beneath the policy headlines lie thousands of lived experiences of people trying to survive the assessment maze.
“I scored the right points but was rejected. I’m exhausted, I’m upset. I don’t get why they refused it.”
— r/DWPhelp
“This process is designed to make you give up. You feel embarrassed just for asking for help.”
— r/DWPhelp
“Had my PIP phone call. It lasted a minute. I’m confused.”
— r/DWPhelp
People report masking symptoms out of fear of being disbelieved. Invisible illnesses like ME/CFS, autism, long COVID, and mental health conditions often go misunderstood.
“On a good day, I can walk. On a bad day, I can’t leave bed. But my assessment was on a good day.”
— r/BenefitsAdviceUK
Yet amidst the struggle, small victories happen:
“Won my PIP appeal for ADHD, ASD and anxiety. Backdated from January.”
— r/BenefitsAdviceUK
These stories remind us that while the process can be dehumanising, persistence and support can make all the difference.
Every benefits system is vulnerable to abuse, and PIP is no exception. Yet the actual fraud rate for PIP is estimated by the DWP to be around 0.1%, far lower than most people believe.
(Official DWP data)
Because PIP fraud is often lumped in with other benefits fraud figures, sensationalist headlines about “benefit cheats” persist, fuelling suspicion and political cover for tougher rules. The headlines and media articles focus on people ‘getting back to work’, but PIP is not means-tested. That means you can be in work and still claim it.
Ironically, the complexity of the system means savvy claimants who can “play the game” — those with strong literacy, access to advocates, or legal help — are more likely to succeed than people who are genuinely too ill to fight.
“The system rewards people who can word things perfectly. I’m brain-fogged half the time — I can barely fill in the forms.”
— r/DWPhelp
Reform should therefore focus not on “punishing fraud,” but on creating fairness — making PIP accessible to those too sick, anxious, or cognitively impaired to navigate it alone.
PIP assessments often leave people feeling stripped of dignity. The repetitive need to “prove” suffering can re-traumatise those already dealing with pain or mental illness.
However, small acts of control like bringing a trusted person to assessments, documenting interactions, and appealing unfair decisions, can help reclaim some agency. Community support groups on Reddit, Facebook and TikTok show people sharing advice, scripting appeals, and celebrating each other’s wins. That solidarity matters.
The following section is a structured, step-by-step resource designed to be easily scanned. Think of it as a “spreadsheet in text”, a compact survival manual for anyone applying, renewing, or appealing PIP in 2025.
| Stage | What To Do | Key Tips | Support To Seek |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Applying | Gather all medical and functional evidence | Keep a symptom diary; ask GPs and specialists for detailed letters describing your daily limitations | Disability charities, Citizens Advice, local welfare rights units |
| Filling in the “How Your Disability Affects You” form | Describe how tasks are affected, not just if you can do them | Use real examples (“I can cook, but only for 5 minutes before pain forces me to sit”) | Ask someone to proofread; check guides from Benefits and Work |
| During Assessment (phone, video or in-person) | Stay calm and take breaks | Say if today is a “good” or “bad” day; explain how variable your condition is | Bring someone to support you; take notes immediately after |
| After Decision Letter | Read carefully; identify descriptors you disagree with | Mark which tasks were undervalued; compare to DWP guidance | Welfare advisers can help decode decisions |
| Mandatory Reconsideration (MR) | Submit within one month | Provide any new evidence; explain clearly where the assessor erred | Citizens Advice, Scope, or your MP’s caseworker |
| Appeal Tribunal | Prepare for a formal hearing | Speak about your worst days, not your best | Legal aid clinics, disability advocates, or local law centres |
| After Appeal | If successful, ensure your award is backdated | Check amount and end date; request written decision | Keep all documents for future renewals |
The table above summarises the essentials, but if you need more detail, here’s the deeper version of that roadmap.
No one should have to face this system alone. Support services like Citizens Advice, Scope, Turn2Us, and local disability networks can make the process less brutal.
Because the harshest cuts were removed earlier this year, the Autumn Budget might not immediately alter PIP rates. But subtle changes could still matter — from freezing uprating to tweaking eligibility reviews.
The best outcome would be a Budget that protects PIP, ensures a fair review process, and signals that disability support is a social investment, not a fiscal burden.
Reforming PIP isn’t just about saving money; it’s about how society treats those who need compassion most.
If you’re a claimant, know that your struggle is real and valid. Keep records, lean on community, and fight your corner.
If you’re a policymaker or ally, remember that behind every “case number” is a human life — often isolated, exhausted, but deserving of dignit.
I hate the system and can’t afford food – but don’t have the right on top of my M.S